Best Electric Cars · EVCar Data Desk
2027 Volvo EX90 vs Toyota C-HR: EPA Range and Recall Overview
For prospective electric SUV buyers evaluating the 2027 Volvo EX90 (21 Inch Wheels) Standard 2WD and the 2027 Toyota C-HR AWD 18inch Small 4WD, the differences in EPA range and efficiency, charging times, and safety history offer a clear perspective on what to expect. While both vehicles come without any current NHTSA recalls, their EPA-estimated driving ranges and energy consumption vary subtly, with implications for usage and cost of ownership.
Key Findings
- The 2027 Volvo EX90 offers a slightly higher EPA range of 291 miles compared to Toyota C-HR's 287 miles.
- The Toyota C-HR has superior energy efficiency, achieving a combined 117 MPGe versus the EX90's 98 MPGe.
- Charging the C-HR on a 240V Level 2 charger takes 8 hours, whereas the EX90 requires 10 hours.
- Both models currently have zero recalls reported by NHTSA, indicating no known widespread safety issues.
- The Volvo EX90 is a larger, 2WD standard SUV, while the Toyota C-HR is a smaller, 4WD compact SUV, catering to different driver needs.
EPA Range Comparison
The EPA-estimated range is a crucial factor for electric vehicle buyers determining how far they can go between charges under standardized test conditions. The 2027 Volvo EX90 (21 Inch Wheels) Standard 2WD achieves an EPA range of 291 miles, slightly edging out the 2027 Toyota C-HR AWD 18inch Small 4WD, which has a range of 287 miles. This marginal difference means the EX90 can travel a few miles farther before needing a recharge, but the difference may be less noticeable in real-world driving, subject to factors like driving style, terrain, and climate.
Energy Efficiency: MPGe and Driving Conditions
Energy efficiency, measured in miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe), indicates how economically a vehicle uses electricity. The Toyota C-HR offers a combined MPGe rating of 117 MPGe, outperforming the Volvo EX90's combined 98 MPGe. Higher MPGe translates to lower energy consumption per mile, potentially reducing electricity costs.
Looking closer, the C-HR scores 127 MPGe in city driving and 107 MPGe on the highway, compared to the EX90's 104 MPGe city and 91 MPGe highway. This suggests the C-HR maintains a more efficient energy use pattern across driving scenarios, which is notable given its all-wheel drive setup and smaller size.
Charging Times
Charging duration influences usability, especially for drivers relying on overnight or Level 2 public chargers. The Toyota C-HR requires about 8.00 hours to charge fully on a 240V Level 2 charger, whereas the Volvo EX90 takes longer at 10.00 hours. Buyers who prioritize shorter charging intervals might find the C-HR more convenient in scenarios lacking fast DC chargers.
Recall Status and Safety Implications
Safety recall history matters for new vehicle purchasers, though not the only criterion of safety. Both the 2027 Volvo EX90 (21 Inch Wheels) 2WD and the 2027 Toyota C-HR AWD 18inch Small SUV have zero recalls reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to date. This lack of recalls indicates no current widespread defects or safety-related issues have been identified, but buyers should monitor recall databases periodically as new information can emerge after market launch.
Vehicle Size and Drive Configuration Differences
The Volvo EX90 is classified as a standard sport utility vehicle and is equipped with two-wheel drive, likely rear-wheel or front-wheel depending on configuration, and larger 21-inch wheels. In contrast, the Toyota C-HR is a smaller sport utility vehicle with all-wheel drive and smaller 18-inch wheels. These attributes affect not only performance characteristics but also interior space, ride comfort, and handling. Buyers needing larger passenger or cargo capacity might lean toward the EX90, while those preferring a compact SUV with enhanced traction in varied weather might favor the C-HR.
Summary of Technical Specifications
| Specification | Volvo EX90 2WD (21 Inch Wheels) | Toyota C-HR AWD (18 Inch Wheels) |
|---|---|---|
| EPA Range | 291 miles | 287 miles |
| Combined MPGe | 98 MPGe | 117 MPGe |
| City MPGe | 104 MPGe | 127 MPGe |
| Highway MPGe | 91 MPGe | 107 MPGe |
| Level 2 (240V) Charge Time | 10.00 hours | 8.00 hours |
| NHTSA Recalls | 0 recalls | 0 recalls |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which vehicle has the longer EPA range?
The Volvo EX90 2WD has a slightly longer EPA range of 291 miles compared to the Toyota C-HR AWD's 287 miles.
Which vehicle is more energy efficient?
The Toyota C-HR AWD is more energy efficient, with a combined rating of 117 MPGe, higher than the Volvo EX90's 98 MPGe.
How long does it take to charge each vehicle with a 240V charger?
The C-HR charges in about 8.00 hours, while the EX90 requires roughly 10.00 hours.
Are there any safety recalls for either vehicle?
As of now, neither the 2027 Volvo EX90 2WD nor the 2027 Toyota C-HR AWD has any NHTSA recalls reported.
What drive configurations do these SUVs have?
The Volvo EX90 comes in a two-wheel drive setup, while the Toyota C-HR is equipped with all-wheel drive.
Conclusion
When deciding between the 2027 Volvo EX90 (21 Inch Wheels) Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and the 2027 Toyota C-HR AWD 18inch Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, buyers must balance factors beyond just EPA range as both offer similar mileage on a full charge. The C-HR stands out for superior energy efficiency and shorter Level 2 charge times, making it an economical choice especially for urban or mixed driving. The EX90, on the other hand, offers a slightly greater EPA range and a larger vehicle profile that may appeal to those valuing interior space and two-wheel drive simplicity.
Neither vehicle currently exhibits recall concerns, which adds confidence in their initial safety standards. Ultimately, the choice may come down to individual needs for efficiency, size, drive configuration, and charging convenience, with both models representing competitive options in the evolving electric SUV market for 2027.
